Resources

  • Infographics
The New Testament and the Septuagint — Faith Deposited

Faith Deposited — textual evidence · part 1 of 2

The New Testament and the Septuagint

How the NT authors’ quotation habits reveal which Old Testament they were using

The pattern

NT authors quote the LXX — not the Hebrew

Of the roughly 300 Old Testament quotations in the New Testament, the majority align with the Septuagint (LXX) rather than the Masoretic Text (MT) — the Hebrew text finalized by Jewish scribes centuries after Christ.

~300OT quotations in the NT
~2/3follow the LXX where texts diverge
27NT books written in Greek
Follows LXX
~60%
Mixed / unclear
~25%
Follows MT
~15%

Proportions vary by counting method; the LXX majority is consistent across studies. Sources: Swete, Brenton, and subsequent LXX scholarship.

Key passages

Where the wording matters

Cases where the LXX and MT differ meaningfully — and the NT author follows the LXX. The choice of text is often theologically load-bearing.

Isaiah 7:14 → Matthew 1:23

LXX (Greek)

“Behold, the virgin shall conceive…”

Greek: parthenos (virgin)

MT (Hebrew)

“Behold, the young woman shall conceive…”

Hebrew: almah (young woman)

Matthew 1:23

Matthew quotes parthenos — the LXX word — to ground the virginal conception. The choice of text is theologically essential; the MT reading cannot carry the same weight.

Psalm 22:16 (21:17 LXX) → Passion accounts

LXX (Greek)

“…they have pierced my hands and feet.”

Greek: ōryxan (they pierced)

MT (Hebrew)

“…like a lion [at] my hands and feet.”

Hebrew kā’ărî — grammatically disputed

Passion typology

The LXX’s “pierced” reading is what the Fathers and NT writers apply to the crucifixion. The MT is ambiguous at best; the LXX is unambiguous.

Amos 9:11–12 → Acts 15:16–17 (Council of Jerusalem)

LXX (Greek)

“…so that the remnant of mankind may seek the Lord…”

Greek: kataloipon tōn anthrōpōn

MT (Hebrew)

“…so that they may possess the remnant of Edom…”

Hebrew: edom vs. adam — one consonant differs

Acts 15:17

James cites Amos to justify Gentile inclusion at the Jerusalem Council. His argument only works with the LXX’s “remnant of mankind” — the MT’s “Edom” reading would undercut the point entirely.

The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Early Church — Faith Deposited

Faith Deposited — textual evidence · part 2 of 2

The Dead Sea Scrolls and the early Church

Manuscript evidence and historical reception confirm the LXX as the scripture of the apostolic age

The Dead Sea Scrolls

When were they written, and what do they contain?

Roughly 900 manuscripts discovered 1947–1956 in eleven caves near Khirbet Qumran — the oldest known biblical manuscripts in existence, predating the earliest complete Masoretic Text by nearly a thousand years.

~900manuscripts discovered
11caves at Qumran
1947–56years of discovery
38+OT books represented

Approximate dates — in context

LXX translated
Dead Sea Scrolls
400 BC
200 BC
1 AD
200 AD
300 AD
Dead Sea Scrolls (c. 250 BC – 68 AD)
LXX translation (c. 280–130 BC)
Masoretic Text finalized (c. 700–1000 AD — off scale)

The eleven caves

Cave 1 & Cave 4 — the most significant Great Isaiah Scroll · Community Rule · Habakkuk Pesher

Cave 1 yielded the Great Isaiah Scroll (1QIsaa) — the oldest complete book of the Bible, c. 125 BC. Cave 4 was the most prolific, containing fragments from nearly every OT book, including 4QJer and 4QDeut, which align with the LXX against the MT.

Caves 2, 3, 5–10Smaller finds

Additional biblical fragments, sectarian texts, and the Copper Scroll (Cave 3).

Cave 11Temple Scroll

The longest DSS (8.15m). Also a Psalms scroll with additional compositions.

CommunityWho wrote them?

Likely the Essenes. Hidden when Rome advanced in 68 AD, before the fall of Jerusalem.

Books found

Every book of the Hebrew Bible is represented except Esther. Green indicates significant LXX alignment against the MT.

Attested in DSS
Significant LXX alignment
Torah5 books
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers4QNumb closer to LXX
Deuteronomy4QDeutj “sons of God” with LXX at 32:8
Former Prophets4 books
Joshua
Judges
Samuel4QSama — variants closer to LXX
Kings
Latter Prophets4 books
Isaiah1QIsaa — complete, c. 125 BC
Jeremiah4QJerb,d — shorter text matches LXX
Ezekiel
The Twelveall 12 minor prophets
Writings10 books
Psalmsmost attested; LXX-adjacent readings
Job
Proverbs
Ruth
Song of Songs
Lamentations
Qohelet
Daniel
Ezra-Nehemiah
Chronicles

Esther — not found at Qumran

Deuterocanonical books2 books
TobitAramaic & Hebrew copies found
Sirach (Ben Sira)Hebrew fragments
Sectarian & other texts
1 EnochAramaic fragments
Jubilees
Community Rule (1QS)
War Scroll (1QM)
Habakkuk Pesher
Temple Scroll
Copper Scroll

Historical reception

The Church Fathers on the LXX

The LXX was the Old Testament of the early Church — treated not merely as useful, but as authoritative and providentially given.

c. 150 AD
Justin Martyr

Argues in the Dialogue with Trypho that Jews had removed Christ-predicting texts from their scriptures — but these remained in the LXX. For Justin, the LXX is the authentic prophetic witness.

c. 185 AD
Irenaeus of Lyon

In Against Heresies, defends the LXX’s parthenos (“virgin”) at Isaiah 7:14 against those who substitute neanis (“young woman”). Treats the LXX translation as providentially accurate.

c. 240 AD
Origen

Compiles the Hexapla — six parallel columns including the LXX and Hebrew — to account for divergences. Despite his critical apparatus, uses the LXX as the Church’s text and defends its inspiration.

c. 397–402 AD
Augustine vs. Jerome

Jerome translates the Vulgate from the Hebrew; Augustine objects, arguing the LXX’s authority is confirmed by apostolic use. The Western Church continues using LXX-derived texts in the Psalms and other books for centuries.

Sources: Emanuel Tov, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible (3rd ed.); Frank Moore Cross, The Ancient Library of Qumran; Karen Jobes & Moisés Silva, Invitation to the Septuagint (2nd ed.); Eugene Ulrich, The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Origins of the Bible; Henry Barclay Swete, An Introduction to the OT in Greek.

  • Links
  • other external resources